Historian Vincent Harding quoted a West African poet and said, “I am a citizen of a country that does not yet exist.” He went on to assert that this is a country that we still must create—a country “that cares about itself and about the world, that cares about what the earth needs as well as what individual people need.”
Harding hit the nail on the head.
Creating a country starts in our schools.
Our current learning culture is stale and reeking of industrialism. We educate children like they are blank slates and passive vessels. We pry out their talents and gifts until there are none left. And we cage them up like livestock for at least twelve years of their lives. And then we throw them into the scary and uncomfortable world of the unknown.
As a society, we aren’t realizing the true purpose of school—becoming lifelong learners and active, engaged citizens in democracy. Conformity and sticking in your shell is no longer the shortcut to success. What separates the best from the average in the world is grit, uniqueness, drive, and resilience.
Is it an accident that learning environments are contrary to the natural process of learning? Absolutely not.
One of the purposes for building a public school system a century ago was to ensure that millions of children weren’t roaming the streets and causing mayhem. School was there to civilize them into meek members of the population. It has worked perfectly, even to this date.
What’s more, the very dogmas that guide our schools go awry when stood up against the principles of basic cognition. Human beings learn best by doing and experience, not by ingesting and swallowing facts and figures. Look at young children: They laugh, they cry, they sing, they dance.
Suddenly, at age five, it’s as if they get arrested and thrown into an Alcatraz-like system called formal schooling. Most unstructured play vanishes. Days of freewheeling laughter, exploring, and creating get replaced by bubble filling content. What industrial-age institutions are engaging in is a crime, one that continues to cheat generations.
For all the chit-chat on education reform, very few are asking the question: What is the purpose of school? Ask yourself that. And then define what is “good” education. I suspect that far too many people will say that the end result should be high grades and test scores and prestigious college acceptance letters. That would confirm that in school, curiosity, happiness, and creativity are second-string and that America has lost its way. We need to recognize the fruits of American ingenuity.
That’s why we are desperately craving for a learning renaissance where the old order of education is shattered and institutions adapt and reinvent or go extinct. Public education may be the only institution that has largely remained the same as it was a century ago.
Imagine if we transformed schools into French salons of the 17th century, social engines, and public spaces for tinkering, hacking, and disrupting. Imagine if everyone in the community engaged with one another and the barriers that divide us came crashing down. Imagine if kids love going to school each and every day. A transformation on this scale entails setting people free to “unlock the code of their souls.”
Is this even possible? It is if we’re committed to shifting our industrial gears into a disruptive mindset and diverting trillions of dollars that we frivolously spend on standardized testing and “Race to the Top” circuses into making these radical changes a reality.
As Doug Thomas and John Seely Brown write in their book, A New Culture of Learning, “The goal is for each of us to take the world in and make it part of ourselves. In doing so, it turns out, we can re-create it.”
It takes a village to raise a lifelong learner. If we follow the lead of schools which treat children like artists, creators, and empathizers, then we are on the stepping stones to creating a truly United States of America.
Nikhil Goyal is the author of “One Size Does Not Fit All: A Student’s Assessment of School.” Goyal, 17, is also a student at Syosset High School in New York.
Who is Osama bin Laden? Is he famous? Is he in a band as well? And why should I care? These were all questions that teenagers tweeted in May 2011 on the night President Obama announced that U.S. special operations forces killed Osama Bin Laden. Data released by Yahoo! concluded that two thirds of the people who searched “Who is Osama bin Laden?” that night were teenagers between the ages of 13 and 17 years old.
I’ll give these kids a break—many of them were very young during the September 11th attacks. Still, you would think that at some point in their many years of schooling that somebody would have mentioned and discussed the most wanted man in the world, his background, and why thousands of American servicemen and women are stationed in Afghanistan. With such a heavy focus on what’s tested—math and English—our public schools simply aren’t teaching civics and current events.
As a result, a 2007 Harvard University study determined that a majority of teens are ignorant about current affairs and do not read the newspaper. Moreover, a Pew Research Center survey found that people age 18 to 34-years-old are consistently less knowledgeable about current events than their elders. On a current events quiz, young adults averaged 5.9 correct answers out of 12 questions, fewer than the averages for Americans ages 35 to 49 and above age 50. Many of these teenagers are or will be voters in a short time. I don’t think there’s anything more frightening than this.
Fortunately, a former New York Times editor is trying to upend the astonishing rise of ignorant Americans with her new startup, Kicker. Intended for people who are “turned off by traditional news media and want to “make a difference” and “get in the know easily,” founder Holly Ojalvo, a Brooklyn-based entrepreneur, hopes to disrupt the way teenagers engage with the fourth estate.
“A lot of news products aimed at high school and college students are designed as curriculum supplement,” says Ojalvo. “Some are alright, but it shouldn’t be the only way to engage young people for current events.” For teenagers, Ojalvo explains that news is overwhelming, confusing, irrelevant, and hopeless. “We want kids to feel smart, not stupid,” she says.
What Kicker does is make the news accessible, engaging, and actionable. There are only few news stories a day, expressing the highlights of major stories and writers use info graphics, tweets, maps, and quotes—”whatever tells the story best,” says Ojalvo. Perhaps, the most significant in the trio of elements of Kicker is that each story has a way for the reader to take action.
For instance, a recent piece on global warming suggested that young people can get involved by signing the Climate Reality Pledge, joining a virtual march, or a local 350.org group. As Ojalvo puts it, “When someone’s telling you a story, the kicker is the gist, the takeaway, the zinger. The kicker to any story we tell you is that you can start taking action. Right now. And we’ll point you in the right direction.”
For the future of Kicker, Ojalvo plans on experimenting with a few new features and will be collaborating with a Columbia University class on a digital strategy for the company and Brooklyn Law School, who is providing legal assistance.
To hammer away at the civics crisis in America where three quarters of high school seniors are unable to identify a power granted to Congress by the Constitution among other embarrassments, we should be turning to sites like Kicker.
It isn’t just teens who need more civics and current affairs education, either. Do you recall the recent Saturday Night Live skit mocking “undecided voters?” Undecided voters were invited to ask questions about the election. Questions included, “When is the election? What were the names of the two people running? Who is the president right now? Is he or she running?” While the skit was undoubtedly exaggerated, it’s based in reality: Ojalvo says that adults in their 40s and 50s are secretly emailing her that they need Kicker to understand what’s going on, too.
So to every American who fails to identify the President of the United States, unable to pass the citizenship test, or just wants to comprehend the cluttered national conversation, it would do you very well to spend a minutes a day on Kicker. Let’s mark the words of Adlai Stevenson: “As citizens of this democracy, you are the rulers and the ruled, the law-givers and the law-abiding, the beginning and the end.”
Teen raising hand photo via Shutterstock
As a 17-year-old high school student, I’m both a No Child Left Behind and a Race to the Top baby. I’ve lived through both pieces of failed legislation under former Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings and now current Secretary Arne Duncan that have seriously derailed the status of education in this country. But I’m optimistic. Along with millions of frustrated students, educators, and parents, I’m committed to a radical reinvention of the system from scratch.
And while it isn’t official yet, Secretary Duncan has hinted that he will return to President Obama’s cabinet for a second term. I can tell you that isn’t good news.
At the Council of Chief State Officers conference last week, Duncan outlined the basics of a second-term education agenda with plans to “replicate” the work the administration did in its first term. He hopes to reauthorize the defective No Child Left Behind law and continue his carrot-and-stick approach to ramming his proposals into states and school districts. Secretary Duncan’s most likely appointment is a clear sign to the American public that President Obama has turned a blind eye toward students, educators, and parents.
Look, I wholeheartedly respect Secretary Duncan and I’ve met him a number of times, but the Department of Education deserves nothing more than a big fat F for its first term. Race to the Top has been an utter failure for brutalizing the teaching profession, adding irrational testing for preschoolers (I wish I was kidding), driving a national obsession over high-stakes testing, and pushing for charters to hijack public schools. It’s like a “Russian novel, because it’s long, it’s complicated, and in the end, everybody gets killed,” as one superintendent quipped.
And now Secretary Duncan wants to “replicate” all of this. Give me a break. Education is not a race; it is a journey. And as John Dewey said, “Education is not preparation for life; education is life itself.”
I don’t have a doubt that the president will re-appoint Mr. Duncan, but my question is: Why should the future of American education hang in limbo because President Obama wants to keep his pal for basketball scrimmages? Let me begin by noting that the president doesn’t even agree with Duncan on a number of things. In his State of the Union address last year, Obama declared that schools should “teach with creativity and passion; to stop teaching to the test”—antithetical to his very own Department of Education’s policies.
This model of governing, adopted from the Chicago schools system, is simply broken.
Recollect Secretary Duncan’s unnerving operations when he was the head honcho of Chicago public schools a few years ago, when he bounced kids around from district to district to make it appear as though schools were “turning around.” Duncan did not confront the issue of the effect of poverty on learning in a city where 80% of the school children live below the poverty line. He dumbed down standards, misleading the public when he proclaimed that test scores had risen. Mr. Duncan shuttered “failing” schools, replacing neighborhood schools with charters, often run by billionaires and corporations. Duncan didn’t address the abysmal 40% dropout rate, a national embarrassment. If his reforms unequivocally failed miserably in Chicago, how the hell were they supposed to work successfully on the national level?
At NBC Education Nation, Governor Mitt Romney lauded Duncan for his stellar track record; Romney raving about a Democrat should raise some eyebrows. Finally, take note that Duncan called Governor Bobby Jindal, a politician who has tried strenuously with his iron fist to obliterate public education and establish a voucher system to more than half of the students in the state of Louisiana, ”a visionary leader.”
The last thing our schools need is Arne Duncan for four more years. President Obama—sack him now or you will soon find millions of educators, students, and parents in your backyard. Mark my words. Public education has had enough. Teachers have had enough. Students have had enough. Parents have had enough.
Call it whatever you want, but this is a blatant full-blown assault on institutions that educate the members of our democracy.
You know what would be a radical, and a popular, move by President Obama? If he appointed a progressive thinker to be the Education Secretary, someone such as Joichi Ito, Monika Hardy, Sir Ken Robinson, Lisa Nielsen, Gever Tulley, or Alfie Kohn, all of whom want to truly transform the way we learn. Now, that would be a big deal.
GOOD Education: The Rise of Democratic Schools and ‘Solutionaries': Why Adults Need to Get Out of the WayPosted: November 19, 2012
Twenty years ago at the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro, Severn Cullis-Suzuki, a 12-year-old girl from Canada, “silenced the world for six minutes” with her raw and powerful oration lambasting adults for dumping the problems they created onto the next generation. “At school, even in kindergarten, you teach us how to behave in the world,” she said. “You teach us to not to fight with others, to work things out, to respect others and to clean up our mess, not to hurt other creatures, to share, not be greedy. Then, why do you go out and do the things you tell us not to do?”
Last March, Esquire revealed what it called the current “War on Youth”. In July, Newsweek dubbed millennials “Generation Screwed”. In the middle of this mayhem, young people have been left on the sidelines, given the cold shoulder, and ignored. In my life, I’ve been told to shut up, sit down, and listen. I witness this every single day at school. Top-down, rigid policies dictate word-for-word what students and teachers must do and learn. As a young person, very few seem to be on our side and even fewer attempt to strengthen our voice. Education thought leader Paulo Freire once quipped, “If the structure does not permit dialogue, the structure must be changed.”
Young people bring a fresh angle to the conversation. It may not always be correct, but at the very least that perspective isn’t drowned in years and years of expertise. You wonder why this may be the best time in human civilization to be a young entrepreneur. Anyone can invent or create something without the risk of failing miserably considering the networks, mentors, and resources we’re bathing in.
Most adults are simply not doing enough, except for perhaps Charlie Kouns and David Loitz—the visionaries at Imagining Learning. Around the United States, Kouns, Loitz, and their team have been hosting listening sessions, inviting young people to share their revelations and insights on education.
“We have been told by students that this was often the first they had been asked to share their own views on education,” says Loitz. “We must provide a safe space for them to express this vision, to dream, critique, revise, and reinvent the world in which we live.”
After these listening sessions, Kouns and Loitz analyze and try to make sense of what they have learned by connecting the voices of young people around the nation. Now students are even calling up Imagining Learning to hold sessions in their own communities. Their ultimate goal as Kouns tells me is to “create a national collective voice on the wisdom of young people.” They are certainly on their way.
Now let’s frame the disenfranchisement of youth in terms of the role that schools play. Zoe Weil, president at the Institute for Humane Education, puts it point-blank. “Given the grave problems that confront them—at a time when we face dwindling resources and when one billion of whom don’t even have access to clean water and enough food—young people need real knowledge, tools, and motivation, and if they don’t receive these in school we are, in essence, wasting their time and threatening their future.” That’s why Weil argues that we need to create a generation of “solutionaries.” Ones who are willing to attach themselves to a cause or issue that is greater than themselves.
Some schools, that rarely get much media attention, have made Weil’s philosophy their mission. This includes some democratic, Montessori, and public schools, like the Brooklyn Free School, Sudbury Valley School, and the MET Schools.
Let’s put the microscope on democratic schools. In 2005 at the Berlin International Democratic Education Conference, participants agreed on this statement to define these institutions: “We believe that, in any educational setting, young people have the right: to decide individually how, when, what, where, and with whom they learn to have an equal share in the decision-making as to how their organizations—in particular their schools—are run, and which rules and sanctions, if any, are necessary.”
I spoke with the leading voice in the alternative school movement, Jerry Mintz, the founder of the Alternative Education Resource Organization. “Democratic schools,” Mintz explains, “harness the authority of all members of the community and believe that every community member has something to contribute.” Children are treated and respected like human beings in society and transform into self-directed learners with teachers and mentors as guides on the side. Above all, “the rights of the students are supported,” adds Mintz. (Full Disclosure: A.E.R.O. published my book).
This is a type of school that perhaps I would be anxious to attend every day. Imagine if governments, businesses, and schools took these principles to heart. Imagine how radically different our planet would operate. At first it would ruffle the feathers of an old, white male elite system, but it would in due time result in a spree of efficiency, transparency, and inventiveness
Consider Joichi Ito, director of the M.I.T. Media Lab, in the book What Matters Now (PDF): “We live in an age where people are starving in the midst of abundance and our greatest enemy is our own testosterone driven urge to control our territory and our environments. It’s time we listen to children and allow neoteny to guide us beyond the rigid frameworks and dogma created by adults.” A generation is an invaluable thing to throw away. More than half of the world is under the age of 30. In other words, start listening to my peers—young people!
Severn Cullis-Suzuki’s father has said, “You are what you do, not what you say.” Grown-ups, it’s up to you to give this generation a seat at the table. You owe this to us.
A version of this post originally appeared at WISE-Quatar
Teenager walking image via Shutterstock
This piece originally appeared on GOOD Education: Students For Education Reform? Not the Change We Need. It all began in early August of this year. Stephanie Rivera, a student at Rutgers University and future teacher, published a gutsy, investigative piece uncovering the lunacy behind Students for Education Reform, an organization founded by two Princeton students, Catharine Bellinger and Alexis Morin. I highly suggest you read it yourself, but the commentary struck a profound chord with me for a number of reasons.
SFER has rolled out its corporate reform agenda onto over a hundred college campuses across the nation, which includes defending the takeover of public schools by charters and teacher evaluation systems that tie salaries to test scores. Don’t believe me? Bellinger and Morin, marionettes of the likes of Joel Klein, Michelle Rhee, Wendy Kopp, and Eli Broad, are now forcing some chapters to sign onto agreements that they carry out the mission of SFER—this was, not surprisingly, uncovered by Rivera.
SFER’s primary mission is to close the achievement gap, but as education historian Camika Royal writes (referring to those who generally use the term), the organization only “speaks of academic outcomes, not the conditions that led to those outcomes, nor does it acknowledge that the outcomes are a consequence of those conditions.” Where do they address on their site the putrid effects of poverty on schooling? They don’t.
As journalist Dana Goldstein writes,
“…No school can find decent jobs for under- or unemployed parents who can’t put nutritious food on the table; nor can a school make up for the chronic instability of a young life spent in foster care or moving from apartment to apartment in a futile quest for safe, affordable housing. Volumes of research show such experiences affect cognitive development and children’s ability to focus in school; dedicated educators and counselors work wonders with such children each day, but they don’t rescue neighborhoods from poverty.”
In terms of funding, Education Reform Now gave SFER and Michelle Rhee’s StudentsFirst—or as I like to call it StudentsLast—over $1.6 million in 2010. Remember, this is an organization whose PAC is DFER, a group bankrolled by Wall Street hedge-fund titans, moguls, and a number of billionaires. That’s not to mention that SFER’s board members include evangelists of KIPP and Teach for America. Many of these college students do not realize they are literally being bought out. Both Bellinger and Morin are in bed with these organizations.
When I was in the beginning stages of researching my book, Morin contacted me for a brief conversation and I agreed to speak with her. I recall that she particularly discussed SFER along with the “successes” of the New York City public school system, and said that Mayor Bloomberg had made significant progress. I was flabbergasted. After the conversation Morin, sent me a piece written by Joe Williams, the executive director of Democrats for Education Reform. I kept my unease to myself, but then three months ago Rivera’s piece was published, validating my concerns.
That same day I was banned from posting on SFER’s Facebook page. All I wrote was, “Don’t get tricked by SFER tactics! It promotes a corporate agenda! It’s hurting millions of kids around the country,” and I included a link to Rivera’s post.” Oh well.
A question I’d like to ask is: What is in the water at Princeton University? Two epitomes of failure in educational change—first Teach for America and now Students for Education Reform. Please, make it stop.
Educators, administrators, parents, I beg for you to not think for a second that SFER represents the voice of students. It doesn’t. It is instead a mob of baby sheep, educated in obedience and submission, kowtowing to the forces that seek to obliterate public education. As a student, it’s shameful and degrading watching these delinquents bash the very people who educated them, call for evaluations that reduce children to numbers, and allow for corporations and billionaires to wither away our democracy. It’s a national disgrace.
Longtime teacher Susan Ohanian put it beautifully, “Either you join the revolution or you stand against the needs of children and democracy.” Wake the hell up, America.
Wooden chair and blackboard photo via Shutterstock
Each day, the New York region attempts to ease the suffering and mayhem caused by Hurricane Sandy and return to a period of normalcy. Mass transit systems are slowly awakening after days of being paralyzed. Power lines are being restored. And fuel arteries are becoming unclogged.
In these ailing and grieving times, there are a few flickers of light – stories of extraordinary human beings. A Flatbush, N.Y. man walked more than a mile in the hurricane to save a litter of newborn kittens. Newark Mayor Cory Booker invited victims into his own home. Richard Nicotra, a Staten Island hotel owner, refused to evict hurricane victims from their rooms.
Still, an estimated $50-billion in damages were caused, thousands have lost their homes and millions are still without food, clean water, and heat. We certainly have a long way to go.
On Monday, most schools in New York City, Long Island, and New Jersey resumed operations. Many children returned to schools that are structurally damaged and without heat.
Is this is the right move when millions of Americans are still stranded? This is my plea : Close down schools for the rest of the week and bring students and teachers to disaster relief and volunteer centres to help the hurricane victims. Why? My response: Why not?
First, the fuel intended to heat schools can be re-allocated into distribution centres, soup kitchens, and shelters.
Second and more importantly, we have a perfect learning opportunity at our fingertips to teach young people about the importance of community service and awareness, both of which are fundamentally lacking in American public schools. Across the Tri-State area, organizations are helplessly scrambling for more volunteers. For example, at Randall’s Island Park, more than 50 volunteers are needed for a park clean up. At City Harvest Mobile markets on Staten Island, blankets, food, and water bottles aren’t going to be handed out by themselves. In Far Rockaway, organizers’ hands are tied as they search for canvassers to go door to door to deliver supplies.
Thus, classes of students accompanied by their teachers can attend to specific disaster areas. The most important sources of knowledge are not schools, but rather informal institutions like community centres and museums. By participating in relief activities, students are learning by doing.
Hurricane relief is also service and project-based learning at its best. Curriculum can include spearheading a letter-writing campaign to call on oil companies to pay for relief, creating an app to help drivers find gas stations that are open, or building a simulated model of a New York City levee system. What these three ideas have in common is that they are real-world experiences and grounded in critical thinking and collaboration.
One manifesto goes like this: “We [need to] start creating school as a dynamic social engine for entire towns and cities that drive every citizen toward a higher, greater good: the public interest.” For far too long, we have treated schools like citadels from ancient times, isolated from the outside world. John le Carré once quipped, “A desk is a dangerous place from which to view the world.” Imagine if the city is the school.
As a high-school student, I would love to witness millions of young people go door to door and hand out food and water and blankets, clean up debris, and organize food and clothing drives. My generation is crying out for opportunities to be a part of something bigger than themselves. This would stamp their identities onto rebuilding these devastated communities. This is our call to action. There’s no age limit to partake in the recovery effort.
Sure, if millions of children go to school they will have more hours of instruction added to their bullion, but the opportunity cost is tremendously high. Helping with relief efforts may very well become these kids’ best learning experience of their lives.
Nikhil Goyal is the 17-year-old author of One Size Does Not Fit All: A Student’s Assessment of School, which was published by the Alternative Education Resource Organization in September 2012 and offers ideas to revolutionize education. He is a student at Syosset High School in New York.
Tomorrow, America heads to the polls to elect a president—one that will set the educational agenda for the next four years. President Obama and Governor Romney are so eager to tackle education that although the last presidential debate was about foreign policy, domestic education policy kept coming up. Moderator Bob Schieffer was even forced to interrupt Governor Romney’s soliloquy about how much he loves teachers by quipping, “I think we all love teachers.”
The second I heard Schieffer say that line I prayed that not a single teacher in America would be played for a sucker and hoodwinked into believing it. As a 17-year-old student and author, they sure aren’t fooling me, and they’re not fooling many of America’s educators, either.
A few days after the debate, I came across an essay on the site Students Last. They usually write education satire, but all the teacher love made them post a serious editorial. “America itself has, at least as of late, quite the abusive relationship with teachers—claiming to love teachers but repeatedly disrespecting them in a myriad of ways,” they wrote. If I may, let me continue their brilliant narration and extend it to how the candidates discount the voice of students and teachers.
To Governor Romney:
When you tell me that there is no better model than the current testing system and that you would expand testing in ways that haven’t been thought before, you are not showing love to students and teachers.
When you declare that class sizes do not matter, you are not showing love to students and teachers.
When you say that you would push Congress to reauthorize No Child Left Behind and when a dozen of your top education advisors worked for President George W. Bush, you are not showing love to students and teachers.
When you are running on a ticket with a man whose budget would gut a third of spending in schools and early childhood education, you are not showing love to students and teachers.
To President Obama:
When you blatantly ignore over 400 letters from parents, educators, and students expressing grave concern over your education policies in this nation, you are not showing love to students and teachers.
When you treat education as some competition or “Race to the Top,” you are not showing love to teachers and students. When research concludes that in a time of cuts to education budgets your Race to the Top program is too costly, you are not showing love to students. When your Race to the Top program has caused teaching to the test, billions of dollars in standardized testing, teacher evaluations tied to test scores, and the killing of creativity and the love of learning, you are not showing love to students and teachers.
When your Secretary of Education, Arne Duncan, says he encounters no public opposition to the administration’s policies, you are not showing love to teachers and students. When Duncan remarked, “Students know what’s working and not working in schools before anyone else,” without having a comprehensive and transparent plan to involve students in his administration, you are not showing love to students and teachers.
Of course, Obama and Romney aren’t the only ones disrespecting students and teachers. They take their cues from the corporate reform crowd—I have a few words for them, too.
To the corporate reformers:
When you advocate for Teach For America corps members—recent college graduates whose only experience is a tee-ball league-style five-week training program—to teach in our country’s most disadvantaged schools, you are not showing love to students and teachers.
When you shut out the voices of teachers, parents, and students, in conferences, television talk shows, and panel discussions, you are not showing love to students and teachers.
When you push for charter schools to hijack and evict public schools even though on average they perform worse overall than public schools, you are not showing love to students and teachers.
If Mr. Obama, Mr. Romney, and the corporate reformers they listen to love teachers and students, they should show it. Don’t trot out feel-good lines and attempt to mislead the public into believing that you are on the side of teachers and the students they serve.
So what do we do after Election Day? While most of the money is with those who want to privatize schools, bash teachers, test students, and measure and label everyone, we have power in numbers—the millions of young people, teachers, parents, and administrators who are fed up and waiting to be fired up.
Umair Haque in the Harvard Business Review puts it this way: “In status-quo preserving debates, both (or all) options are concerned with getting back to square one; how to maintain the status quo ante. Status quo-disrupting debates are concerned with getting past square one; not merely restoring a system to a previous states…” If we gut the old education regime and hatch a new renaissance of learning and creation, we will change history forever. The last thing we can do is punt the football and wait for government to act or the next generation to arouse change.
What we are yearning for is a movement of all the stakeholders in education—those who will opt-out of tests and will believe—as John Dewey did—that “education is life itself”, that learning is about the learners, and the community is the curriculum. We need students, parents, and educators committed to, as Laurel Felt suggests, “school spaces that look less like factories and more like labs, libraries, coffee shops, and meeting rooms,” and we need those stakeholders to unleash a conversation in their communities, places of worship, and schools on the future of learning.
We have to adapt, reinvent, and change the course of learning and thinking or go extinct. As John Lydon once declared, “Don’t accept the old order. Get rid of it.” Whatever happens on Election Day, it’s up to us to create a new order in education. Are you with me?
Painted on bricks American flag image via Shutterstock